It seems every victory for internet freedom leads to another battle just around the corner: TPP, SOPA, PIPA — and now net neutrality. With the FCC scheduled to vote on the current net neutrality rules on December 14, pro neutrality efforts are trying to rally support. But as previous efforts have shown, it can be hard to marshal a disengaged public to speak out about dense regulatory proceedings most have trouble understanding. Unfamiliar with the Title II classification of the Communications Act of 1934? Not to worry.
One Twitter user shared a simple breakdown of what the internet will look like if neutrality regulations are removed.
To put it simply, the current net neutrality rules ensure that all internet traffic has to be delivered at the same speeds — from Google searches, to streaming on Netflix, to that Geocities site you built back in 1999 that still exists for some reason. Internet service providers (ISPs) are not allowed to deliver some internet traffic faster than other internet traffic.
If current regulations are repealed, ISPs will be able to charge more for speedier service.
Much like cable TV packages, ISPs will be able to charge extra for faster — or even "normal" — access to websites.
A number of internet package mock-ups began floating around earlier this year:
Before the FCC can vote, they must have a period open for public comment, and the commentary has been as controversial as the issue itself. The FCC opened public commentary back in May. After a wave of pro-neutrality comments, those opposed to the regulations began flooding in by the tens of thousands.
Many people began noticing suspicious similarities among all the comments:
It turns out that many comments were from unwitting Americans who later denied making them. The FCC claimed the fake comments were the result of an attack on its website, but so far have been unable to provide any documentation of the attack.
In October, the Government Accountability Office opened an investigation into the alleged hack.
FCC Chairman Ajit Pai has been the public face of the net neutrality debate. Pai, who was appointed as chairman by President Trump in January, used to work as a lawyer for Verizon, one of the largest ISPs in the country. Before becoming chairman, Pai developed a reputation at the FCC for being pro-merger and anti-regulation.
When talking about repealing Net Neutrality regulations, Pai's go-to answer about the possibility of ISPs prioritizing content has been "it's all hypothetical." Pai's assertion is that just because ISPs would be legally allowed to engage in anti-competitive behavior doesn't mean that they would or ever have.
Pai claims "you would look in vain for any example of behavior like that."
But one Reddit user compiled a list of examples of anti-competitive behavior from ISPs since 2005:
Net neutrality is in a tenuous position. Despite growing public sentiment against deregulation, the FCC appears to be moving forward with its vote to repeal. While congressional intervention would be able to overturn an FCC decision, pro-neutrality advocates emphasize that best chance of saving net neutrality is to call your representatives before the vote in December.
More From Guacamoley
People weren't quite sure how to react to this aquatic obscurity.
Girls may run the world, but it's not always easy.
These thieves are real buttheads.
Fans think Ferris Bueller needs a "day off" to re-think this decision.